Opus 5.5 对比 GPT 6.1 Sol 对比 GPT 6.1 Terra 全新的 GPT Terra 速度快得惊人而且非常便宜！我…

@rubenssoto_ai Speed and cost are impressive, but what does the quality gap look like? If it's 10x faster but requires manual cleanup, the savings disappear pretty quickly on complex tasks.

原文

@rubenssoto_ai 楼中楼 ♥ 1

@itsfazley 3D design is a very specific task, with these speed, imagine this model in tasks like computer usage
原文

@web3devop 回复 ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai claude opus is still the best

原文

@rubenssoto_ai 楼中楼 ♥ 1

@web3devop For sure man, but gpt terra is not supposed to be closer to opus
原文

@jpshrodinger 回复 ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai Terra won

原文

@rubenssoto_ai 楼中楼 ♥ 1

@jpshrodinger hahaaha if you took speed as consideration for sure.
原文

@jshai0 回复 ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai Speed and cost are fine, what about the results/ outcomes?

原文

@rubenssoto_ai 楼中楼 ♥ 1

@jshai0 GPT terra is not supposed to be close to these models in quality, but imagine this speed in computer usage
原文

@neerajjj6785 回复 ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai Opus is next level

原文

@rubenssoto_ai 楼中楼 ♥ 0

@neerajjj6785 Opus is the best but if you need something fast, terra is the correct one
原文

@KrishnaBuildsAI 回复 ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai It's better not to use terra lol

原文

@rubenssoto_ai 楼中楼 ♥ 0

@KrishnaBuildsAI hahaha I think you need to use Terra on the correct task
原文

@theaidesk_ 回复 ♥ 2

@rubenssoto_ai what is terra doing😭

原文

@rubenssoto_ai 楼中楼 ♥ 2

@theaidesk_ Terra was trying to be fast hahahaa
原文

@knowixbuilds 回复 ♥ 4

@rubenssoto_ai Terra is not much of an upgrade from Sol, but its cost is one for the books

原文

@rubenssoto_ai 楼中楼 ♥ 0

@knowixbuilds I think Terra is the correct model if you need something fast and cheap
原文

@karanjagtiani04 回复 ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai Did all three land the same result? 3 minutes next to 52 is the gap I'd want to diff before comparing the bills.

原文

@rubenssoto_ai 楼中楼 ♥ 0

@karanjagtiani04 You can check the result in the video
原文

@yohakujpn 回复 ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai just for me opus 5.5 is even better

原文

@rubenssoto_ai 楼中楼 ♥ 0

@yohakujpn You need to analyze which model is the best for each task...terra can be used for tasks you need something really fast
原文

@VanillaCache 回复 ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai really impressed with the speed and cost with tera here 👌

原文

@rubenssoto_ai 楼中楼 ♥ 1

@VanillaCache if you need something really fast, terra is the one
原文

@YourAKShaw 回复 ♥ 0

@rubenssoto_ai $0.22 and 3m 25s versus $15.36 and 52m 36s is a massive difference. But the outputs aren't equivalent, which makes this a quality-adjusted cost question. Could you run all three against identical acceptance criteria? That's where Terra's economics get interesting.

原文

@rubenssoto_ai 楼中楼 ♥ 0

@YourAKShaw Could you guide me how to do that? I have never tested like this
原文

@Eliopyr 回复 ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai Opus took the scenic route

原文

@rubenssoto_ai 楼中楼 ♥ 0

@Eliopyr For sure, Opus quality is much better, Terra helps when you need something really fast
原文

@HLEET3D 回复 ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai nice test

原文

@DanielZambrini 回复 ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai $15.36 vs $0.22 is a brutal gap for Opus

原文

@rubenssoto_ai 楼中楼 ♥ 0

@DanielZambrini and pretty fast right?
原文

@SahilPanhotra 回复 ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai quality isn't that good but good for quick conversations or small fixes

原文

@rubenssoto_ai 楼中楼 ♥ 0

@SahilPanhotra This model is pretty good at computer usage
原文

@IndependentEco 回复 ♥ 3

@rubenssoto_ai Opus wins for sure

原文

@rubenssoto_ai 楼中楼 ♥ 2

@IndependentEco No doubts man, but like you mentioned on your posts terra is pretty fast...and Im going to try some loops
原文
- @annalea_l 楼中楼 ♥ 2
  
  @rubenssoto_ai @IndependentEco Put the outputs please
  原文
  - @rubenssoto_ai 楼中楼 ♥ 1
    
    @annalea_l @IndependentEco What do you mean with outputs?
    原文

@LeoBuilds_ 回复 ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai Opus is clearly the winner, but quite costly

原文

@rubenssoto_ai 楼中楼 ♥ 1

@LeoBuilds_ For sure mate, Terra has another goal, to be fast and cheap
原文

@BroadsideCode 回复 ♥ 1

I dont really see how they can tout a faster smaller model as something valuable if every single use case is different for every single user. Like. ok its good and pressing buttons, but how many, how complex and how many times does it need to be fixed after. I dont get the cheap models.

原文

@rubenssoto_ai 楼中楼 ♥ 0

@BroadsideCode This model is supposed to be fast and cheap, so it's expected that it won't match the quality of Sol or Opus, especially in a single run. From what I've read, it's really good at computer use, and if you work through multiple iterations, you can get much better results.
原文

@Divine_machine 回复 ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai

原文

@rubenssoto_ai 楼中楼 ♥ 0

@Divine_machine Im not sure if your reaction was good or bad haha
原文
- @Divine_machine 楼中楼 ♥ 1
  
  @rubenssoto_ai Good - having this kind of model for agentic/computer use at this price point is very nice
  原文
  - @rubenssoto_ai 楼中楼 ♥ 0
    
    @Divine_machine Yeah, it is perfect
    原文

@itzs_julien 回复 ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai finally something nice

原文

@rubenssoto_ai 楼中楼 ♥ 1

@itzs_julien about Terra?
原文
- @itzs_julien 楼中楼 ♥ 1
  
  @rubenssoto_ai yes haha
  原文

@pelolisu 回复 ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai Terra is not cheap, 30min on Terra would be ~$2.2. Sol 6.1 in this case is better.

原文

@rubenssoto_ai 楼中楼 ♥ 0

@pelolisu You should not calculate like this man, terra is much faster
原文

@KylePomykala 回复 ♥ 2

@rubenssoto_ai I'm doing some similar tests for creative arena - here is what I got so far

原文

@rubenssoto_ai 楼中楼 ♥ 1

@KylePomykala Wonderful results mate, Im testing Terra with more iterations because you can ask to improve the output since the model is fast and cheap
原文
- @KylePomykala 楼中楼 ♥ 1
  
  @rubenssoto_ai It's ridiculously fast - I think I will have out results for creative arena pretty soon
  原文
  - @rubenssoto_ai 楼中楼 ♥ 0
    
    @KylePomykala let me know
    原文
    - @KylePomykala 楼中楼 ♥ 1
      
      @rubenssoto_ai done :) https://x.com/KylePomykala/status/2114840461890498617?s=20
      原文
      - @rubenssoto_ai 楼中楼 ♥ 0
        
        @KylePomykala Really good quality man, terra seems really great
        原文

@aiZgred 回复 ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai Noo u can not say that! It’s better to join a complainers club and complain on every new model released before even testing it 😅

原文

@rubenssoto_ai 楼中楼 ♥ 1

@aiZgred Oh, sorry, man. I forgot I wasn't supposed to say anything good about the model hahaha.
原文
- @aiZgred 楼中楼 ♥ 1
  
  @rubenssoto_ai 😂😎
  原文

@Noah_Twenty 回复 ♥ 0

@rubenssoto_ai Heyy, Haiku would’ve been very relevant to add in this test

原文

@rubenssoto_ai 楼中楼 ♥ 0

@Noah_Twenty It is a good model to compare, Im going to do that thanks
原文

@AbdoKerdawy 回复 ♥ 2

@rubenssoto_ai Terra isnt the best but the cost difference IS INSANE

原文

@rubenssoto_ai 楼中楼 ♥ 0

@AbdoKerdawy Im testing Terra more, I think Im going to come back with better results
原文
- @AbdoKerdawy 楼中楼 ♥ 1
  
  @rubenssoto_ai Do it!!
  原文

@Ionkosm 回复 ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai Terra is fast but the result... not so much :D At least it was super quick. I think with a few iterations it could scratch the quality of the other two and still being faster

原文

@rubenssoto_ai 楼中楼 ♥ 0

@Ionkosm For sure man, quality opus is Unbitable, but the comparison was more to show the speed and cost.
原文

@Worldi123 回复 ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai Terra at $0.22 and 3.5 minutes vs Opus 5.5 at $15.36 and 52 minutes is a huge gap. Did the outputs hold up in quality, or did Terra need more retries on the harder tasks?

原文

@rubenssoto_ai 楼中楼 ♥ 0

@Worldi123 One shot for all of them mate
原文

@AIVerseUday 回复 ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai Opus crazy

原文

@rubenssoto_ai 楼中楼 ♥ 0

@AIVerseUday Opus is crazy good
原文

@magica_ai 回复 ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai Same task, 70x cost gap. Magica routes work to the right model automatically, so your credits go on results and not on picking the wrong tool.

原文

@ceo_multiai 回复 ♥ 2

Lol, well Opus 5.5 is the leader as always. Its detail is strong. But I got the same result through http://multiai.store, it came out to $2.50 on Opus 5.5, but I feel like nobody's gonna beat that. But if Fable 5.5 comes out, then it'll be interesting to compare these two models

原文