Opus 5.5 проти GPT 6.1 Sol проти GPT 6.1 Terra Новий GPT Terra скажен…

@theaidesk_ Відповідь ♥ 2

@rubenssoto_ai what is terra doing😭

Оригінал

@rubenssoto_ai Вкладена ♥ 2

@theaidesk_ Terra was trying to be fast hahahaa
Оригінал

@knowixbuilds Відповідь ♥ 5

@rubenssoto_ai Terra is not much of an upgrade from Sol, but its cost is one for the books

Оригінал

@rubenssoto_ai Вкладена ♥ 1

@knowixbuilds I think Terra is the correct model if you need something fast and cheap
Оригінал

@karanjagtiani04 Відповідь ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai Did all three land the same result? 3 minutes next to 52 is the gap I'd want to diff before comparing the bills.

Оригінал

@rubenssoto_ai Вкладена ♥ 0

@karanjagtiani04 You can check the result in the video
Оригінал

@yohakujpn Відповідь ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai just for me opus 5.5 is even better

Оригінал

@rubenssoto_ai Вкладена ♥ 0

@yohakujpn You need to analyze which model is the best for each task...terra can be used for tasks you need something really fast
Оригінал

@VanillaCache Відповідь ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai really impressed with the speed and cost with tera here 👌

Оригінал

@rubenssoto_ai Вкладена ♥ 1

@VanillaCache if you need something really fast, terra is the one
Оригінал

@YourAKShaw Відповідь ♥ 0

@rubenssoto_ai $0.22 and 3m 25s versus $15.36 and 52m 36s is a massive difference. But the outputs aren't equivalent, which makes this a quality-adjusted cost question. Could you run all three against identical acceptance criteria? That's where Terra's economics get interesting.

Оригінал

@rubenssoto_ai Вкладена ♥ 0

@YourAKShaw Could you guide me how to do that? I have never tested like this
Оригінал

@Eliopyr Відповідь ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai Opus took the scenic route

Оригінал

@rubenssoto_ai Вкладена ♥ 0

@Eliopyr For sure, Opus quality is much better, Terra helps when you need something really fast
Оригінал

@HLEET3D Відповідь ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai nice test

Оригінал

@DanielZambrini Відповідь ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai $15.36 vs $0.22 is a brutal gap for Opus

Оригінал

@rubenssoto_ai Вкладена ♥ 0

@DanielZambrini and pretty fast right?
Оригінал

@SahilPanhotra Відповідь ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai quality isn't that good but good for quick conversations or small fixes

Оригінал

@rubenssoto_ai Вкладена ♥ 1

@SahilPanhotra This model is pretty good at computer usage
Оригінал

@IndependentEco Відповідь ♥ 3

@rubenssoto_ai Opus wins for sure

Оригінал

@rubenssoto_ai Вкладена ♥ 2

@IndependentEco No doubts man, but like you mentioned on your posts terra is pretty fast...and Im going to try some loops
Оригінал
- @annalea_l Вкладена ♥ 2
  
  @rubenssoto_ai @IndependentEco Put the outputs please
  Оригінал
  - @rubenssoto_ai Вкладена ♥ 1
    
    @annalea_l @IndependentEco What do you mean with outputs?
    Оригінал

@LeoBuilds_ Відповідь ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai Opus is clearly the winner, but quite costly

Оригінал

@rubenssoto_ai Вкладена ♥ 1

@LeoBuilds_ For sure mate, Terra has another goal, to be fast and cheap
Оригінал

@BroadsideCode Відповідь ♥ 1

I dont really see how they can tout a faster smaller model as something valuable if every single use case is different for every single user. Like. ok its good and pressing buttons, but how many, how complex and how many times does it need to be fixed after. I dont get the cheap models.

Оригінал

@rubenssoto_ai Вкладена ♥ 0

@BroadsideCode This model is supposed to be fast and cheap, so it's expected that it won't match the quality of Sol or Opus, especially in a single run. From what I've read, it's really good at computer use, and if you work through multiple iterations, you can get much better results.
Оригінал

@Divine_machine Відповідь ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai

Оригінал

@rubenssoto_ai Вкладена ♥ 0

@Divine_machine Im not sure if your reaction was good or bad haha
Оригінал
- @Divine_machine Вкладена ♥ 1
  
  @rubenssoto_ai Good - having this kind of model for agentic/computer use at this price point is very nice
  Оригінал
  - @rubenssoto_ai Вкладена ♥ 0
    
    @Divine_machine Yeah, it is perfect
    Оригінал

@itzs_julien Відповідь ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai finally something nice

Оригінал

@rubenssoto_ai Вкладена ♥ 1

@itzs_julien about Terra?
Оригінал
- @itzs_julien Вкладена ♥ 1
  
  @rubenssoto_ai yes haha
  Оригінал

@pelolisu Відповідь ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai Terra is not cheap, 30min on Terra would be ~$2.2. Sol 6.1 in this case is better.

Оригінал

@rubenssoto_ai Вкладена ♥ 0

@pelolisu You should not calculate like this man, terra is much faster
Оригінал

@KylePomykala Відповідь ♥ 2

@rubenssoto_ai I'm doing some similar tests for creative arena - here is what I got so far

Оригінал

@rubenssoto_ai Вкладена ♥ 1

@KylePomykala Wonderful results mate, Im testing Terra with more iterations because you can ask to improve the output since the model is fast and cheap
Оригінал
- @KylePomykala Вкладена ♥ 1
  
  @rubenssoto_ai It's ridiculously fast - I think I will have out results for creative arena pretty soon
  Оригінал
  - @rubenssoto_ai Вкладена ♥ 0
    
    @KylePomykala let me know
    Оригінал
    - @KylePomykala Вкладена ♥ 1
      
      @rubenssoto_ai done :) https://x.com/KylePomykala/status/2114840461890498617?s=20
      Оригінал
      - @rubenssoto_ai Вкладена ♥ 1
        
        @KylePomykala Really good quality man, terra seems really great
        Оригінал

@aiZgred Відповідь ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai Noo u can not say that! It’s better to join a complainers club and complain on every new model released before even testing it 😅

Оригінал

@rubenssoto_ai Вкладена ♥ 1

@aiZgred Oh, sorry, man. I forgot I wasn't supposed to say anything good about the model hahaha.
Оригінал
- @aiZgred Вкладена ♥ 1
  
  @rubenssoto_ai 😂😎
  Оригінал

@Noah_Twenty Відповідь ♥ 0

@rubenssoto_ai Heyy, Haiku would’ve been very relevant to add in this test

Оригінал

@rubenssoto_ai Вкладена ♥ 1

@Noah_Twenty It is a good model to compare, Im going to do that thanks
Оригінал
- @Noah_Twenty Вкладена ♥ 0
  
  @rubenssoto_ai Thanks Rubens, looking forward now
  Оригінал

@AbdoKerdawy Відповідь ♥ 2

@rubenssoto_ai Terra isnt the best but the cost difference IS INSANE

Оригінал

@rubenssoto_ai Вкладена ♥ 0

@AbdoKerdawy Im testing Terra more, I think Im going to come back with better results
Оригінал
- @AbdoKerdawy Вкладена ♥ 1
  
  @rubenssoto_ai Do it!!
  Оригінал

@Ionkosm Відповідь ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai Terra is fast but the result... not so much :D At least it was super quick. I think with a few iterations it could scratch the quality of the other two and still being faster

Оригінал

@rubenssoto_ai Вкладена ♥ 0

@Ionkosm For sure man, quality opus is Unbitable, but the comparison was more to show the speed and cost.
Оригінал

@Worldi123 Відповідь ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai Terra at $0.22 and 3.5 minutes vs Opus 5.5 at $15.36 and 52 minutes is a huge gap. Did the outputs hold up in quality, or did Terra need more retries on the harder tasks?

Оригінал

@rubenssoto_ai Вкладена ♥ 0

@Worldi123 One shot for all of them mate
Оригінал

@AIVerseUday Відповідь ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai Opus crazy

Оригінал

@rubenssoto_ai Вкладена ♥ 0

@AIVerseUday Opus is crazy good
Оригінал

@magica_ai Відповідь ♥ 1

@rubenssoto_ai Same task, 70x cost gap. Magica routes work to the right model automatically, so your credits go on results and not on picking the wrong tool.

Оригінал

@ceo_multiai Відповідь ♥ 2

Lol, well Opus 5.5 is the leader as always. Its detail is strong. But I got the same result through http://multiai.store, it came out to $2.50 on Opus 5.5, but I feel like nobody's gonna beat that. But if Fable 5.5 comes out, then it'll be interesting to compare these two models

Оригінал