@rubenssoto_ai Terra is winner here bro, no competition
OryginałOpus 5.5 vs GPT 6.1 Sol vs GPT 6.1 Terra Nowy GPT Terra jest obłędnie szybki i tani! Widzę ten model w tak wielu różnych zastosowaniach. GPT Sol Czas: 30 min 32 s Koszt: $0.96 Opus 5.5 Czas: 52 min 36 s Koszt: $15.36 GPT Terra Czas: 3 min 25 s Koszt: $0.22
0
0
0
0
Komentarze 68
-
-
@kepochnik The quality is not the same, but it is fast hahaha
Oryginał
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai Speed and cost are impressive, but what does the quality gap look like? If it's 10x faster but requires manual cleanup, the savings disappear pretty quickly on complex tasks.
Oryginał-
@itsfazley 3D design is a very specific task, with these speed, imagine this model in tasks like computer usage
Oryginał
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai claude opus is still the best
Oryginał-
@web3devop For sure man, but gpt terra is not supposed to be closer to opus
Oryginał
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai Terra won
Oryginał-
@jpshrodinger hahaaha if you took speed as consideration for sure.
Oryginał
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai Speed and cost are fine, what about the results/ outcomes?
Oryginał-
@jshai0 GPT terra is not supposed to be close to these models in quality, but imagine this speed in computer usage
Oryginał
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai Opus is next level
Oryginał-
@neerajjj6785 Opus is the best but if you need something fast, terra is the correct one
Oryginał
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai It's better not to use terra lol
Oryginał-
@KrishnaBuildsAI hahaha I think you need to use Terra on the correct task
Oryginał
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai what is terra doing😭
Oryginał-
@theaidesk_ Terra was trying to be fast hahahaa
Oryginał
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai Terra is not much of an upgrade from Sol, but its cost is one for the books
Oryginał-
@knowixbuilds I think Terra is the correct model if you need something fast and cheap
Oryginał
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai Did all three land the same result? 3 minutes next to 52 is the gap I'd want to diff before comparing the bills.
Oryginał-
@karanjagtiani04 You can check the result in the video
Oryginał
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai just for me opus 5.5 is even better
Oryginał-
@yohakujpn You need to analyze which model is the best for each task...terra can be used for tasks you need something really fast
Oryginał
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai really impressed with the speed and cost with tera here 👌
Oryginał-
@VanillaCache if you need something really fast, terra is the one
Oryginał
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai $0.22 and 3m 25s versus $15.36 and 52m 36s is a massive difference. But the outputs aren't equivalent, which makes this a quality-adjusted cost question. Could you run all three against identical acceptance criteria? That's where Terra's economics get interesting.
Oryginał -
@rubenssoto_ai Opus took the scenic route
Oryginał-
@Eliopyr For sure, Opus quality is much better, Terra helps when you need something really fast
Oryginał
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai nice test
Oryginał -
@rubenssoto_ai $15.36 vs $0.22 is a brutal gap for Opus
Oryginał-
@DanielZambrini and pretty fast right?
Oryginał
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai quality isn't that good but good for quick conversations or small fixes
Oryginał-
@SahilPanhotra This model is pretty good at computer usage
Oryginał
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai Opus wins for sure
Oryginał -
@rubenssoto_ai Opus is clearly the winner, but quite costly
Oryginał-
@LeoBuilds_ For sure mate, Terra has another goal, to be fast and cheap
Oryginał
-
-
I dont really see how they can tout a faster smaller model as something valuable if every single use case is different for every single user. Like. ok its good and pressing buttons, but how many, how complex and how many times does it need to be fixed after. I dont get the cheap models.
Oryginał-
@BroadsideCode This model is supposed to be fast and cheap, so it's expected that it won't match the quality of Sol or Opus, especially in a single run. From what I've read, it's really good at computer use, and if you work through multiple iterations, you can get much better results.
Oryginał
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai
Oryginał-
@Divine_machine Im not sure if your reaction was good or bad haha
Oryginał
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai finally something nice
Oryginał -
@rubenssoto_ai I'm doing some similar tests for creative arena - here is what I got so far
Oryginał -
@rubenssoto_ai Noo u can not say that! It’s better to join a complainers club and complain on every new model released before even testing it 😅
Oryginał -
@rubenssoto_ai Heyy, Haiku would’ve been very relevant to add in this test
Oryginał -
@rubenssoto_ai Terra isnt the best but the cost difference IS INSANE
Oryginał -
@rubenssoto_ai Terra is fast but the result... not so much :D At least it was super quick. I think with a few iterations it could scratch the quality of the other two and still being faster
Oryginał-
@Ionkosm For sure man, quality opus is Unbitable, but the comparison was more to show the speed and cost.
Oryginał
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai Terra at $0.22 and 3.5 minutes vs Opus 5.5 at $15.36 and 52 minutes is a huge gap. Did the outputs hold up in quality, or did Terra need more retries on the harder tasks?
Oryginał -
@rubenssoto_ai Opus crazy
Oryginał-
@AIVerseUday Opus is crazy good
Oryginał
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai Same task, 70x cost gap. Magica routes work to the right model automatically, so your credits go on results and not on picking the wrong tool.
Oryginał -
Lol, well Opus 5.5 is the leader as always. Its detail is strong. But I got the same result through http://multiai.store, it came out to $2.50 on Opus 5.5, but I feel like nobody's gonna beat that. But if Fable 5.5 comes out, then it'll be interesting to compare these two models
Oryginał -
@rubenssoto_ai Terra look Dope
Oryginał -
@rubenssoto_ai Looks like a roll of Nickles
Oryginał -
@rubenssoto_ai I like this)) You can feel the future in it.
Oryginał
스크롤하면 더 불러옵니다