GPT-6.1 Terra：高速で優れたコンピューター操作を、より低価格で提供します。 GPT-6.1 Terraは画面上の内容を理解し、…

@OpenAI @grok gpt-6.1 terra和6.1 sol对比，谁更强？

元投稿

@OpenAI @grok If I want to use the GPT model to support my task submission, task creation, and task analysis for DFT calculations, can I use this Terra model?Or should I continue to use the previous Sol model?

元投稿

@rakshith_twt 返信 ♥ 0

@OpenAI 🗿🔥

元投稿

@Agent_PlaysAi 返信 ♥ 0

@OpenAI Cheaper computer use matters most for repetitive jobs like filling forms and moving data between apps. Test it on one boring workflow first, before you hand it anything important.

元投稿

@jpattondesign 返信 ♥ 0

@OpenAI New Sora model for the intro video?👀

元投稿

@EmChan09442143 返信 ♥ 0

@OpenAI appreciate the price... but can we have better models? at least opus 5.5 level? Most of us need to get things done beautifully and quickily.

元投稿

@krypto_lexsg 返信 ♥ 0

AA's numbers back the cost story: at max effort ~$0.40 per task on their Intelligence Index vs $1.40 for 5.6 Terra, and hallucination rate down from 88% to 38%. Still 10 pts behind Opus 5.5 there (48 vs 58), so Terra for high-volume computer-use loops, Sol/Astra for the hardest coding.

元投稿

@PrasittimayT 返信 ♥ 0

@OpenAI Why do i have to lower my gpt model to stupid version If I currently use sol 6.1 that smarter

元投稿

@SFdelSur 返信 ♥ 0

@OpenAI lo he probado por primera y última vez. Destruyó mi juego.

元投稿

@_anastaciabelle 返信 ♥ 1

@OpenAI Update update.... Update that don't operate like the GPT we've known since years ago... I see, y'all getting to my emotions now...🙄🙄💔

元投稿

@xy_ni5228 返信 ♥ 0

@OpenAI 厉害

元投稿

@ZaynHe04 返信 ♥ 0

@OpenAI 牛逼

元投稿

@lisiyu0671 返信 ♥ 0

@OpenAI where is your 6.1Astra

元投稿

@meenochtec 返信 ♥ 0

@OpenAI Fast computer use is the headline — for daily shipping I’m watching whether it stays up when everyone hits it at once. Capability without capacity is still just a demo.

元投稿

@aqdasthetic__ 返信 ♥ 0

@OpenAI The workday agent era just got a whole lot cheaper

元投稿

@rocklee153553 返信 ♥ 0

@OpenAI Is it a cheaper but less intelligent model? What I need is a model that performs better than OPUS 5.5; it doesn’t necessarily have to be cheaper.

元投稿