임베드 보드

사용자 등록 기반 큐레이션

Opus 5.5 vs GPT 6.1 Sol vs GPT 6.1 Terra Il nuovo GPT Terra è pazzesco, veloce ed economico! Posso immaginare questo modello utilizzato in tantissimi ambiti diversi. GPT Sol Tempo: 30min 32s Costo: $0.96 Opus 5.5 Tempo: 52min 36s Costo: $15.36 GPT Terra Tempo: 3min 25s Costo: $0.22

0 0 0 0

Commenti 68

  • @itsfazley Risposta ♥ 4

    @rubenssoto_ai Speed and cost are impressive, but what does the quality gap look like? If it's 10x faster but requires manual cleanup, the savings disappear pretty quickly on complex tasks.

    Originale
    • @rubenssoto_ai Annidata ♥ 1

      @itsfazley 3D design is a very specific task, with these speed, imagine this model in tasks like computer usage

      Originale
  • @jshai0 Risposta ♥ 1

    @rubenssoto_ai Speed and cost are fine, what about the results/ outcomes?

    Originale
    • @rubenssoto_ai Annidata ♥ 1

      @jshai0 GPT terra is not supposed to be close to these models in quality, but imagine this speed in computer usage

      Originale
    • @rubenssoto_ai Annidata ♥ 0

      @neerajjj6785 Opus is the best but if you need something fast, terra is the correct one

      Originale
  • @knowixbuilds Risposta ♥ 4

    @rubenssoto_ai Terra is not much of an upgrade from Sol, but its cost is one for the books

    Originale
    • @rubenssoto_ai Annidata ♥ 0

      @knowixbuilds I think Terra is the correct model if you need something fast and cheap

      Originale
  • @karanjagtiani04 Risposta ♥ 1

    @rubenssoto_ai Did all three land the same result? 3 minutes next to 52 is the gap I'd want to diff before comparing the bills.

    Originale
    • @rubenssoto_ai Annidata ♥ 0

      @yohakujpn You need to analyze which model is the best for each task...terra can be used for tasks you need something really fast

      Originale
  • @YourAKShaw Risposta ♥ 0

    @rubenssoto_ai $0.22 and 3m 25s versus $15.36 and 52m 36s is a massive difference. But the outputs aren't equivalent, which makes this a quality-adjusted cost question. Could you run all three against identical acceptance criteria? That's where Terra's economics get interesting.

    Originale
    • @rubenssoto_ai Annidata ♥ 0

      @Eliopyr For sure, Opus quality is much better, Terra helps when you need something really fast

      Originale
  • @SahilPanhotra Risposta ♥ 1

    @rubenssoto_ai quality isn't that good but good for quick conversations or small fixes

    Originale
  • @BroadsideCode Risposta ♥ 1

    I dont really see how they can tout a faster smaller model as something valuable if every single use case is different for every single user. Like. ok its good and pressing buttons, but how many, how complex and how many times does it need to be fixed after. I dont get the cheap models.

    Originale
    • @rubenssoto_ai Annidata ♥ 0

      @BroadsideCode This model is supposed to be fast and cheap, so it's expected that it won't match the quality of Sol or Opus, especially in a single run. From what I've read, it's really good at computer use, and if you work through multiple iterations, you can get much better results.

      Originale
  • @KylePomykala Risposta ♥ 2

    @rubenssoto_ai I'm doing some similar tests for creative arena - here is what I got so far

    Originale
    • @rubenssoto_ai Annidata ♥ 1

      @KylePomykala Wonderful results mate, Im testing Terra with more iterations because you can ask to improve the output since the model is fast and cheap

      Originale
  • @aiZgred Risposta ♥ 1

    @rubenssoto_ai Noo u can not say that! It’s better to join a complainers club and complain on every new model released before even testing it 😅

    Originale
  • @Noah_Twenty Risposta ♥ 0

    @rubenssoto_ai Heyy, Haiku would’ve been very relevant to add in this test

    Originale
  • @Ionkosm Risposta ♥ 1

    @rubenssoto_ai Terra is fast but the result... not so much :D At least it was super quick. I think with a few iterations it could scratch the quality of the other two and still being faster

    Originale
    • @rubenssoto_ai Annidata ♥ 0

      @Ionkosm For sure man, quality opus is Unbitable, but the comparison was more to show the speed and cost.

      Originale
  • @Worldi123 Risposta ♥ 0

    @rubenssoto_ai Terra at $0.22 and 3.5 minutes vs Opus 5.5 at $15.36 and 52 minutes is a huge gap. Did the outputs hold up in quality, or did Terra need more retries on the harder tasks?

    Originale
  • @magica_ai Risposta ♥ 0

    @rubenssoto_ai Same task, 70x cost gap. Magica routes work to the right model automatically, so your credits go on results and not on picking the wrong tool.

    Originale
  • @ceo_multiai Risposta ♥ 1

    Lol, well Opus 5.5 is the leader as always. Its detail is strong. But I got the same result through http://multiai.store, it came out to $2.50 on Opus 5.5, but I feel like nobody's gonna beat that. But if Fable 5.5 comes out, then it'll be interesting to compare these two models

    Originale
  • @GoooSAI Risposta ♥ 0

    @rubenssoto_ai I like this)) You can feel the future in it.

    Originale
스크롤하면 더 불러옵니다