@rubenssoto_ai Speed and cost are impressive, but what does the quality gap look like? If it's 10x faster but requires manual cleanup, the savings disappear pretty quickly on complex tasks.
मूलOpus 5.5 बनाम GPT 6.1 Sol बनाम GPT 6.1 Terra नया GPT Terra पागलपन की हद तक तेज़ और सस्ता है! मैं देख सकता हूँ कि इस मॉडल का उपयोग कितनी अलग-अलग जगहों पर किया जाएगा। GPT Sol समय: 30मिनट 32सेकंड लागत: $0.96 Opus 5.5 समय: 52मिनट 36सेकंड लागत: $15.36 GPT Terra समय: 3मिनट 25सेकंड लागत: $0.22
0
0
0
0
टिप्पणियाँ 76
-
-
@itsfazley 3D design is a very specific task, with these speed, imagine this model in tasks like computer usage
मूल
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai claude opus is still the best
मूल-
@web3devop For sure man, but gpt terra is not supposed to be closer to opus
मूल
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai Terra won
मूल-
@jpshrodinger hahaaha if you took speed as consideration for sure.
मूल
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai Speed and cost are fine, what about the results/ outcomes?
मूल-
@jshai0 GPT terra is not supposed to be close to these models in quality, but imagine this speed in computer usage
मूल
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai Opus is next level
मूल-
@neerajjj6785 Opus is the best but if you need something fast, terra is the correct one
मूल
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai It's better not to use terra lol
मूल-
@KrishnaBuildsAI hahaha I think you need to use Terra on the correct task
मूल
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai what is terra doing😭
मूल-
@theaidesk_ Terra was trying to be fast hahahaa
मूल
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai Terra is not much of an upgrade from Sol, but its cost is one for the books
मूल-
@knowixbuilds I think Terra is the correct model if you need something fast and cheap
मूल
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai Did all three land the same result? 3 minutes next to 52 is the gap I'd want to diff before comparing the bills.
मूल-
@karanjagtiani04 You can check the result in the video
मूल
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai just for me opus 5.5 is even better
मूल-
@yohakujpn You need to analyze which model is the best for each task...terra can be used for tasks you need something really fast
मूल
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai really impressed with the speed and cost with tera here 👌
मूल-
@VanillaCache if you need something really fast, terra is the one
मूल
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai $0.22 and 3m 25s versus $15.36 and 52m 36s is a massive difference. But the outputs aren't equivalent, which makes this a quality-adjusted cost question. Could you run all three against identical acceptance criteria? That's where Terra's economics get interesting.
मूल-
@YourAKShaw Could you guide me how to do that? I have never tested like this
मूल
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai Opus took the scenic route
मूल-
@Eliopyr For sure, Opus quality is much better, Terra helps when you need something really fast
मूल
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai nice test
मूल -
@rubenssoto_ai $15.36 vs $0.22 is a brutal gap for Opus
मूल-
@DanielZambrini and pretty fast right?
मूल
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai quality isn't that good but good for quick conversations or small fixes
मूल-
@SahilPanhotra This model is pretty good at computer usage
मूल
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai Opus wins for sure
मूल -
@rubenssoto_ai Opus is clearly the winner, but quite costly
मूल-
@LeoBuilds_ For sure mate, Terra has another goal, to be fast and cheap
मूल
-
-
I dont really see how they can tout a faster smaller model as something valuable if every single use case is different for every single user. Like. ok its good and pressing buttons, but how many, how complex and how many times does it need to be fixed after. I dont get the cheap models.
मूल-
@BroadsideCode This model is supposed to be fast and cheap, so it's expected that it won't match the quality of Sol or Opus, especially in a single run. From what I've read, it's really good at computer use, and if you work through multiple iterations, you can get much better results.
मूल
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai
मूल -
@rubenssoto_ai finally something nice
मूल -
@rubenssoto_ai Terra is not cheap, 30min on Terra would be ~$2.2. Sol 6.1 in this case is better.
मूल-
@pelolisu You should not calculate like this man, terra is much faster
मूल
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai I'm doing some similar tests for creative arena - here is what I got so far
मूल-
@KylePomykala Wonderful results mate, Im testing Terra with more iterations because you can ask to improve the output since the model is fast and cheap
मूल
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai Noo u can not say that! It’s better to join a complainers club and complain on every new model released before even testing it 😅
मूल -
@rubenssoto_ai Heyy, Haiku would’ve been very relevant to add in this test
मूल-
@Noah_Twenty It is a good model to compare, Im going to do that thanks
मूल
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai Terra isnt the best but the cost difference IS INSANE
मूल -
@rubenssoto_ai Terra is fast but the result... not so much :D At least it was super quick. I think with a few iterations it could scratch the quality of the other two and still being faster
मूल-
@Ionkosm For sure man, quality opus is Unbitable, but the comparison was more to show the speed and cost.
मूल
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai Terra at $0.22 and 3.5 minutes vs Opus 5.5 at $15.36 and 52 minutes is a huge gap. Did the outputs hold up in quality, or did Terra need more retries on the harder tasks?
मूल-
@Worldi123 One shot for all of them mate
मूल
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai Opus crazy
मूल-
@AIVerseUday Opus is crazy good
मूल
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai Same task, 70x cost gap. Magica routes work to the right model automatically, so your credits go on results and not on picking the wrong tool.
मूल -
Lol, well Opus 5.5 is the leader as always. Its detail is strong. But I got the same result through http://multiai.store, it came out to $2.50 on Opus 5.5, but I feel like nobody's gonna beat that. But if Fable 5.5 comes out, then it'll be interesting to compare these two models
मूल -
@rubenssoto_ai Terra look Dope
मूल -
@rubenssoto_ai Looks like a roll of Nickles
मूल -
@rubenssoto_ai I like this)) You can feel the future in it.
मूल-
@GoooSAI For sure mate
मूल
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai I would announce that ops5.5 win
मूल-
@Smart04261410 The quality for sure, but cost and speed terra is the winner
मूल
-
스크롤하면 더 불러옵니다