@ArtificialAnlys
मूलOpenAI ने लागत दक्षता की सीमा को आगे बढ़ाते हुए GPT-6.1 Terra रिलीज़ किया है। यह GPT-5.6 के बाद पहला Terra-क्लास मॉडल है, और लागत के एक तिहाई से भी कम में अधिक बुद्धिमान है। प्रति टोकन मूल्य निर्धारण GPT-5.6 Terra का आधा या उससे कम है - पिछले मॉडल के लिए $2/$12 की तुलना में प्रति मिलियन इनपुट/आउटपुट टोकन पर $1/$5। कैश लिखना भी आधा हो गया है, अब प्रति मिलियन टोकन पर $1.25 है। कैش किया गया इनपुट प्रति मिलियन टोकन $0.20 के मुकाबले एक चौथाई यानी $0.05 है। मुख्य बातें: ➤ बुद्धिमत्ता बनाम लागत के लिए पारेतो-इष्टतम
0
0
0
0
टिप्पणियाँ 21
-
-
@ArtificialAnlys Not gonna lie, Seems like a pathetic launch based on these numbers
मूल -
@ArtificialAnlys cost frontier is one axis. on the people's side, openai's best liked model right now is gpt 6.1 sol at #16 of 317 (6.8 vibe from 15.8k voices), while gpt 5.6 terra sits at #74 with a 6.1. will be watching whether 6.1 terra closes that gap with actual users
मूल -
@ArtificialAnlys Per Artificial Analysis, output pricing falls to $5 per million tokens from $12, and the cost to complete its benchmark tasks at max effort drops to $0.40 from $1.40. Cached input is cut to $0.05 per million tokens from $0.20.
मूल -
@ArtificialAnlys Good chart, thanks
मूल -
@ArtificialAnlys For computer use, tokens per finished task matters more than price per token. A model that needs fewer screenshots and retries can still win on the real bill. Would love to see cost per completed task next to per-token pricing.
मूल -
@ArtificialAnlys cached input going from $0.20 to $0.05 is the line i'd look at first. agent loops resend the same long context every step, so on long runs the cache price probably moves the bill more than the $1/$5 headline.
मूल -
@ArtificialAnlys bruh?
मूल -
seeing the exact same ordering in codex on farmerbench (three 6-hour seeds each at medium effort): gpt-6.1 sol: 74.1 mean at $0.47 a run (159 points/$) gpt-6 astra: 66.6 mean at $1.79 a run (37 points/$) gpt-6.1 terra: 62.2 mean at $0.22 a run (286 points/$) gpt-6 luna: 15.7 mean at $0.08 a run (189 points/$) at 286 points per dollar and 2m 56s a run, terra sits right on the pareto frontier between deepseek v4.1 flash ($0.13/run, 46.8 mean) and 6.1 sol ($0.47/run, 74.1 mean).
मूल -
@ArtificialAnlys This is the same Sonnet fumble. Dinner and more expensive than Sol. No place for it.
मूल -
@ArtificialAnlys @grok if this has 20 point jump in Terminal-Bench 4.0 eval and matches gpt-6.1 sol at max effort, does that mean it is excellent for coding work given cost?
मूल -
@ArtificialAnlys Benchmarks look great. I'll give Terra, Claude and Grok the same real task today and post cost per task.
मूल -
@ArtificialAnlys umm https://x.com/garyfung/status/2114849687396286696
मूल -
@ArtificialAnlys Opus 5.5 still seems like the best
मूल -
@ArtificialAnlys Cool, OpenAI's really been pushing on cost efficiency these days. Looking forward to seeing its actual performance.
मूल -
@ArtificialAnlys 更强还不到三分之一成本，这波确实狠
मूल -
@ArtificialAnlys Not the most impressive upgrade, more like a tiny improvement. Competes with 6.1 Sol depending on the reasoning level. xHigh seems to be particularly lazy
मूल -
@ArtificialAnlys Virei ateu de benchmark
मूल -
@ArtificialAnlys who is terra for? it's 6 points under sol on the coding agent index, and for agent work it still looks underwhelming next to sonnet 5.5. is the case just low effort at volume, where it sits on the cost frontier?
मूल -
@ArtificialAnlys 🤯🤯
मूल -
@ArtificialAnlys The hallucination drop (88% to 38% guess rate) is the stat I'd care about most for screen work. A wrong click costs more than a wrong sentence. Any plan to break that out by effort level?
मूल
스크롤하면 더 불러옵니다