임베드 보드

사용자 등록 기반 큐레이션

Opus 5.5 vs GPT 6.1 Sol vs GPT 6.1 Terra ¡El nuevo GPT Terra es increíblemente rápido y barato! Puedo ver este modelo siendo usado en muchas áreas diferentes. GPT Sol Tiempo: 30min 32s Costo: $0.96 Opus 5.5 Tiempo: 52min 36s Costo: $15.36 GPT Terra Tiempo: 3min 25s Costo: $0.22

0 0 0 0

Comentarios 71

  • @knowixbuilds Respuesta ♥ 5

    @rubenssoto_ai Terra is not much of an upgrade from Sol, but its cost is one for the books

    Original
    • @rubenssoto_ai Anidada ♥ 1

      @knowixbuilds I think Terra is the correct model if you need something fast and cheap

      Original
  • @karanjagtiani04 Respuesta ♥ 1

    @rubenssoto_ai Did all three land the same result? 3 minutes next to 52 is the gap I'd want to diff before comparing the bills.

    Original
    • @rubenssoto_ai Anidada ♥ 0

      @yohakujpn You need to analyze which model is the best for each task...terra can be used for tasks you need something really fast

      Original
  • @VanillaCache Respuesta ♥ 1

    @rubenssoto_ai really impressed with the speed and cost with tera here 👌

    Original
  • @YourAKShaw Respuesta ♥ 0

    @rubenssoto_ai $0.22 and 3m 25s versus $15.36 and 52m 36s is a massive difference. But the outputs aren't equivalent, which makes this a quality-adjusted cost question. Could you run all three against identical acceptance criteria? That's where Terra's economics get interesting.

    Original
    • @rubenssoto_ai Anidada ♥ 0

      @Eliopyr For sure, Opus quality is much better, Terra helps when you need something really fast

      Original
  • @SahilPanhotra Respuesta ♥ 1

    @rubenssoto_ai quality isn't that good but good for quick conversations or small fixes

    Original
    • @rubenssoto_ai Anidada ♥ 2

      @IndependentEco No doubts man, but like you mentioned on your posts terra is pretty fast...and Im going to try some loops

      Original
  • @BroadsideCode Respuesta ♥ 1

    I dont really see how they can tout a faster smaller model as something valuable if every single use case is different for every single user. Like. ok its good and pressing buttons, but how many, how complex and how many times does it need to be fixed after. I dont get the cheap models.

    Original
    • @rubenssoto_ai Anidada ♥ 0

      @BroadsideCode This model is supposed to be fast and cheap, so it's expected that it won't match the quality of Sol or Opus, especially in a single run. From what I've read, it's really good at computer use, and if you work through multiple iterations, you can get much better results.

      Original
  • @pelolisu Respuesta ♥ 1

    @rubenssoto_ai Terra is not cheap, 30min on Terra would be ~$2.2. Sol 6.1 in this case is better.

    Original
  • @KylePomykala Respuesta ♥ 2

    @rubenssoto_ai I'm doing some similar tests for creative arena - here is what I got so far

    Original
    • @rubenssoto_ai Anidada ♥ 1

      @KylePomykala Wonderful results mate, Im testing Terra with more iterations because you can ask to improve the output since the model is fast and cheap

      Original
  • @aiZgred Respuesta ♥ 1

    @rubenssoto_ai Noo u can not say that! It’s better to join a complainers club and complain on every new model released before even testing it 😅

    Original
  • @Noah_Twenty Respuesta ♥ 0

    @rubenssoto_ai Heyy, Haiku would’ve been very relevant to add in this test

    Original
  • @Ionkosm Respuesta ♥ 1

    @rubenssoto_ai Terra is fast but the result... not so much :D At least it was super quick. I think with a few iterations it could scratch the quality of the other two and still being faster

    Original
    • @rubenssoto_ai Anidada ♥ 0

      @Ionkosm For sure man, quality opus is Unbitable, but the comparison was more to show the speed and cost.

      Original
  • @Worldi123 Respuesta ♥ 1

    @rubenssoto_ai Terra at $0.22 and 3.5 minutes vs Opus 5.5 at $15.36 and 52 minutes is a huge gap. Did the outputs hold up in quality, or did Terra need more retries on the harder tasks?

    Original
  • @magica_ai Respuesta ♥ 1

    @rubenssoto_ai Same task, 70x cost gap. Magica routes work to the right model automatically, so your credits go on results and not on picking the wrong tool.

    Original
  • @ceo_multiai Respuesta ♥ 2

    Lol, well Opus 5.5 is the leader as always. Its detail is strong. But I got the same result through http://multiai.store, it came out to $2.50 on Opus 5.5, but I feel like nobody's gonna beat that. But if Fable 5.5 comes out, then it'll be interesting to compare these two models

    Original
  • @GoooSAI Respuesta ♥ 1

    @rubenssoto_ai I like this)) You can feel the future in it.

    Original
  • @Im_pritam18 Respuesta ♥ 0

    @rubenssoto_ai check this too https://x.com/Im_pritam18/status/2114879422146998310?s=20

    Original
  • @emonuxui Respuesta ♥ 0

    @rubenssoto_ai Terra for speed and volume, Opus for complex reasoning. Different tools for different jobs.

    Original
스크롤하면 더 불러옵니다