임베드 보드

사용자 등록 기반 큐레이션

Opus 5.5 vs. GPT 6.1 Sol vs. GPT 6.1 Terra Der neue GPT Terra ist wahnsinnig schnell und günstig! Ich kann mir vorstellen, dass dieses Modell in so vielen verschiedenen Bereichen eingesetzt wird. GPT Sol Zeit: 30 Min. 32 Sek. Kosten: 0,96 $ Opus 5.5 Zeit: 52 Min. 36 Sek. Kosten: 15,36 $ GPT Terra Zeit: 3 Min. 25 Sek. Kosten: 0,22 $

0 0 0 0

Kommentare 73

    • @rubenssoto_ai Antwortthread ♥ 0

      @neerajjj6785 Opus is the best but if you need something fast, terra is the correct one

      Original
  • @knowixbuilds Antwort ♥ 5

    @rubenssoto_ai Terra is not much of an upgrade from Sol, but its cost is one for the books

    Original
    • @rubenssoto_ai Antwortthread ♥ 1

      @knowixbuilds I think Terra is the correct model if you need something fast and cheap

      Original
  • @karanjagtiani04 Antwort ♥ 1

    @rubenssoto_ai Did all three land the same result? 3 minutes next to 52 is the gap I'd want to diff before comparing the bills.

    Original
    • @rubenssoto_ai Antwortthread ♥ 0

      @yohakujpn You need to analyze which model is the best for each task...terra can be used for tasks you need something really fast

      Original
  • @YourAKShaw Antwort ♥ 0

    @rubenssoto_ai $0.22 and 3m 25s versus $15.36 and 52m 36s is a massive difference. But the outputs aren't equivalent, which makes this a quality-adjusted cost question. Could you run all three against identical acceptance criteria? That's where Terra's economics get interesting.

    Original
    • @rubenssoto_ai Antwortthread ♥ 0

      @YourAKShaw Could you guide me how to do that? I have never tested like this

      Original
    • @rubenssoto_ai Antwortthread ♥ 0

      @Eliopyr For sure, Opus quality is much better, Terra helps when you need something really fast

      Original
  • @SahilPanhotra Antwort ♥ 1

    @rubenssoto_ai quality isn't that good but good for quick conversations or small fixes

    Original
    • @rubenssoto_ai Antwortthread ♥ 2

      @IndependentEco No doubts man, but like you mentioned on your posts terra is pretty fast...and Im going to try some loops

      Original
  • @BroadsideCode Antwort ♥ 1

    I dont really see how they can tout a faster smaller model as something valuable if every single use case is different for every single user. Like. ok its good and pressing buttons, but how many, how complex and how many times does it need to be fixed after. I dont get the cheap models.

    Original
    • @rubenssoto_ai Antwortthread ♥ 0

      @BroadsideCode This model is supposed to be fast and cheap, so it's expected that it won't match the quality of Sol or Opus, especially in a single run. From what I've read, it's really good at computer use, and if you work through multiple iterations, you can get much better results.

      Original
  • @pelolisu Antwort ♥ 1

    @rubenssoto_ai Terra is not cheap, 30min on Terra would be ~$2.2. Sol 6.1 in this case is better.

    Original
  • @KylePomykala Antwort ♥ 2

    @rubenssoto_ai I'm doing some similar tests for creative arena - here is what I got so far

    Original
    • @rubenssoto_ai Antwortthread ♥ 1

      @KylePomykala Wonderful results mate, Im testing Terra with more iterations because you can ask to improve the output since the model is fast and cheap

      Original
  • @aiZgred Antwort ♥ 1

    @rubenssoto_ai Noo u can not say that! It’s better to join a complainers club and complain on every new model released before even testing it 😅

    Original
  • @Noah_Twenty Antwort ♥ 0

    @rubenssoto_ai Heyy, Haiku would’ve been very relevant to add in this test

    Original
  • @Ionkosm Antwort ♥ 1

    @rubenssoto_ai Terra is fast but the result... not so much :D At least it was super quick. I think with a few iterations it could scratch the quality of the other two and still being faster

    Original
    • @rubenssoto_ai Antwortthread ♥ 0

      @Ionkosm For sure man, quality opus is Unbitable, but the comparison was more to show the speed and cost.

      Original
  • @Worldi123 Antwort ♥ 1

    @rubenssoto_ai Terra at $0.22 and 3.5 minutes vs Opus 5.5 at $15.36 and 52 minutes is a huge gap. Did the outputs hold up in quality, or did Terra need more retries on the harder tasks?

    Original
  • @magica_ai Antwort ♥ 1

    @rubenssoto_ai Same task, 70x cost gap. Magica routes work to the right model automatically, so your credits go on results and not on picking the wrong tool.

    Original
  • @ceo_multiai Antwort ♥ 2

    Lol, well Opus 5.5 is the leader as always. Its detail is strong. But I got the same result through http://multiai.store, it came out to $2.50 on Opus 5.5, but I feel like nobody's gonna beat that. But if Fable 5.5 comes out, then it'll be interesting to compare these two models

    Original
  • @GoooSAI Antwort ♥ 1

    @rubenssoto_ai I like this)) You can feel the future in it.

    Original
    • @rubenssoto_ai Antwortthread ♥ 0

      @Smart04261410 The quality for sure, but cost and speed terra is the winner

      Original
  • @Im_pritam18 Antwort ♥ 0

    @rubenssoto_ai check this too https://x.com/Im_pritam18/status/2114879422146998310?s=20

    Original
  • @emonuxui Antwort ♥ 0

    @rubenssoto_ai Terra for speed and volume, Opus for complex reasoning. Different tools for different jobs.

    Original
스크롤하면 더 불러옵니다