@rubenssoto_ai Speed and cost are impressive, but what does the quality gap look like? If it's 10x faster but requires manual cleanup, the savings disappear pretty quickly on complex tasks.
الأصلOpus 5.5 ضد GPT 6.1 Sol ضد GPT 6.1 Terra GPT Terra الجديد سريع بشكل جنوني ورخيص! يمكنني أن أتخيل هذا النموذج يُستخدَم في الكثير من المجالات المختلفة. GPT Sol الوقت: 30 دقيقة 32 ثانية التكلفة: $0.96 Opus 5.5 الوقت: 52 دقيقة 36 ثانية التكلفة: $15.36 GPT Terra الوقت: 3 دقائق 25 ثانية التكلفة: $0.22
0
0
0
0
التعليقات 67
-
-
@itsfazley 3D design is a very specific task, with these speed, imagine this model in tasks like computer usage
الأصل
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai claude opus is still the best
الأصل-
@web3devop For sure man, but gpt terra is not supposed to be closer to opus
الأصل
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai Terra won
الأصل-
@jpshrodinger hahaaha if you took speed as consideration for sure.
الأصل
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai Speed and cost are fine, what about the results/ outcomes?
الأصل-
@jshai0 GPT terra is not supposed to be close to these models in quality, but imagine this speed in computer usage
الأصل
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai Opus is next level
الأصل-
@neerajjj6785 Opus is the best but if you need something fast, terra is the correct one
الأصل
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai It's better not to use terra lol
الأصل-
@KrishnaBuildsAI hahaha I think you need to use Terra on the correct task
الأصل
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai what is terra doing😭
الأصل-
@theaidesk_ Terra was trying to be fast hahahaa
الأصل
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai Terra is not much of an upgrade from Sol, but its cost is one for the books
الأصل-
@knowixbuilds I think Terra is the correct model if you need something fast and cheap
الأصل
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai Did all three land the same result? 3 minutes next to 52 is the gap I'd want to diff before comparing the bills.
الأصل-
@karanjagtiani04 You can check the result in the video
الأصل
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai just for me opus 5.5 is even better
الأصل-
@yohakujpn You need to analyze which model is the best for each task...terra can be used for tasks you need something really fast
الأصل
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai really impressed with the speed and cost with tera here 👌
الأصل-
@VanillaCache if you need something really fast, terra is the one
الأصل
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai $0.22 and 3m 25s versus $15.36 and 52m 36s is a massive difference. But the outputs aren't equivalent, which makes this a quality-adjusted cost question. Could you run all three against identical acceptance criteria? That's where Terra's economics get interesting.
الأصل -
@rubenssoto_ai Opus took the scenic route
الأصل-
@Eliopyr For sure, Opus quality is much better, Terra helps when you need something really fast
الأصل
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai nice test
الأصل -
@rubenssoto_ai $15.36 vs $0.22 is a brutal gap for Opus
الأصل-
@DanielZambrini and pretty fast right?
الأصل
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai quality isn't that good but good for quick conversations or small fixes
الأصل-
@SahilPanhotra This model is pretty good at computer usage
الأصل
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai Opus wins for sure
الأصل -
@rubenssoto_ai Opus is clearly the winner, but quite costly
الأصل-
@LeoBuilds_ For sure mate, Terra has another goal, to be fast and cheap
الأصل
-
-
I dont really see how they can tout a faster smaller model as something valuable if every single use case is different for every single user. Like. ok its good and pressing buttons, but how many, how complex and how many times does it need to be fixed after. I dont get the cheap models.
الأصل-
@BroadsideCode This model is supposed to be fast and cheap, so it's expected that it won't match the quality of Sol or Opus, especially in a single run. From what I've read, it's really good at computer use, and if you work through multiple iterations, you can get much better results.
الأصل
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai
الأصل-
@Divine_machine Im not sure if your reaction was good or bad haha
الأصل
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai finally something nice
الأصل -
@rubenssoto_ai I'm doing some similar tests for creative arena - here is what I got so far
الأصل-
@KylePomykala Wonderful results mate, Im testing Terra with more iterations because you can ask to improve the output since the model is fast and cheap
الأصل
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai Noo u can not say that! It’s better to join a complainers club and complain on every new model released before even testing it 😅
الأصل -
@rubenssoto_ai Heyy, Haiku would’ve been very relevant to add in this test
الأصل -
@rubenssoto_ai Terra isnt the best but the cost difference IS INSANE
الأصل -
@rubenssoto_ai Terra is fast but the result... not so much :D At least it was super quick. I think with a few iterations it could scratch the quality of the other two and still being faster
الأصل-
@Ionkosm For sure man, quality opus is Unbitable, but the comparison was more to show the speed and cost.
الأصل
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai Terra at $0.22 and 3.5 minutes vs Opus 5.5 at $15.36 and 52 minutes is a huge gap. Did the outputs hold up in quality, or did Terra need more retries on the harder tasks?
الأصل -
@rubenssoto_ai Opus crazy
الأصل-
@AIVerseUday Opus is crazy good
الأصل
-
-
@rubenssoto_ai Same task, 70x cost gap. Magica routes work to the right model automatically, so your credits go on results and not on picking the wrong tool.
الأصل -
Lol, well Opus 5.5 is the leader as always. Its detail is strong. But I got the same result through http://multiai.store, it came out to $2.50 on Opus 5.5, but I feel like nobody's gonna beat that. But if Fable 5.5 comes out, then it'll be interesting to compare these two models
الأصل -
@rubenssoto_ai Terra look Dope
الأصل -
@rubenssoto_ai Looks like a roll of Nickles
الأصل -
@rubenssoto_ai I like this)) You can feel the future in it.
الأصل -
@rubenssoto_ai I would announce that ops5.5 win
الأصل
스크롤하면 더 불러옵니다